Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michel Bauwens's avatar

Amazing article, this represents a true historical pivot, and I am very happy you formulate it so cogently, and that it is matched by real practice. I have a section of the wiki dedicated to similar efforts, under the general heading of 'Neotraditionalism', see https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Category:Neotraditional

Expand full comment
Sam Lanfranco's avatar

Will, thanks for adding to the discussion of (a) trying to protect land use, (b) preserving/sustaining traditional knowledge and (c) learning from traditional practices. I live on a large Canadian island in Lake Ontario (a.k.a. Prince Edward County) where we are using Land Trusts, Conservation Areas, Provencal Parks and other means to preserve farm land and prevent the over urbanization of rural area.

You write: “the formalization of Commitment Pooling requires establishing clear guidelines and legal frameworks. This formalization doesn't mean stripping away the essence of these traditions but rather protecting and strengthening them.”

I have long pondered aspects of the following question regarding traditional knowledge and traditional practices. It sounds simple but it is not. Question: In the absence of formal training or codified knowledge and rules, what is the internal social dynamic around how knowledge and practices are passed on from generation to generation?

I worry that as attractive and seemingly logical as it might appear, accumulating traditional knowledge (as a product”), and established guidelines and legal frameworks may both miss the role of the internal social dynamic (may even stifle it), and leave us with traditional knowledge residing out of context.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts